When the customer is an AI agent: getting your pricing ready

Picture a customer who has just bought a car. Instead of opening three comparison sites, they ask their AI assistant to find them motor cover. The assistant asks a few questions, sends those answers to a handful of insurers, reads what comes back and lays out the options.

None of that is far off. Assistants already book restaurants, compare broadband deals and fill in forms. Insurance is a product with a clear set of questions and a price at the end, which makes it an obvious next job for them.

So the question for an insurer or MGA isn't whether this will happen. It's whether your pricing can talk to a piece of software as well as it talks to a person.

Agents don't fill in forms

A person can work their way through a quote journey, guess what an odd question means and click past a pop-up. An agent can't be relied on to do any of that. It does far better with something built for machines:

  • a pricing API that takes a known set of fields and returns a price;
  • an MCP server, the open standard AI clients use to discover tools, read what they need and call them;
  • a partner platform that already has your pricing wired in, with the agent working inside it.

Whichever route it takes, the agent has to understand your product well enough to ask the customer the right questions, and then make sense of the answer.

Five things an agent needs from your rater

1. Questions it can understand

A field called ncd_yrs means something to your underwriters. It means very little to an agent trying to word a question for a customer. Every input needs a type, the values it accepts and a plain description of what it is asking.

In Swallow, each input in a model has a key, a type, a default and a description, and fields with fixed options carry their list of options with them. The API can return a project's inputs as a JSON Schema, so an agent can build a valid request without guessing.

2. A clear yes, no or maybe

An agent has to know whether a quote can actually be bought. A price on its own isn't enough. Every response should say whether the quote is valid, declined or needs an underwriter, and why.

A Swallow quote comes back with valid set to false when an exclusion fires, and any refer rules that fired are listed by name with the values that set them off. An agent that reads the response can't mistake a declined quote for an offer.

3. The same price everywhere

If the agent is quoted one figure and the customer sees another on your website, you have a trust problem. The fix is to have one model behind every channel, so a risk gets the same price however it arrives.

4. A reason it can repeat

Customers will ask the agent why the premium is so high, or why it went up. The agent can only give a straight answer if your engine explains its own working. Add debug=true to a Swallow quote and the response includes every input, lookup, formula and rule the engine worked through. Our quote debugging guide walks through a real one.

5. A quick answer

An agent might ask for several quotes in one conversation, with a customer waiting. Slow prices make for a slow conversation, and an agent can simply move on. If your rater keeps up with comparison site traffic, it will keep up with agents.

The duty stays with you

Putting an agent between you and the customer doesn't hand your obligations to anyone else. You still need customers to understand what they are buying, to get a product that suits them and to pay a fair price. A few things are worth thinking about now:

  • Key information. How do exclusions, excesses and limits reach the customer when they never see your quote page?
  • Answers given for the customer. If the agent fills in a field on the customer's behalf, how will you check it before cover starts?
  • Customers who need more help. How will you spot someone in a vulnerable situation when you never speak to them?
  • The record. Could you show exactly what was quoted, from which answers, by which version of the model?

Plain input descriptions, explicit decisions and a full trace all help here. Every Swallow quote is saved with its input, its output and the version that priced it, so the last question always has an answer.

Start now, whoever is asking

None of this needs agents to be mainstream first. The same work improves every channel you already sell through:

  1. Run your pricing from one rating engine that serves your API, forms and AI clients.
  2. Describe every input as if you were explaining the question to a customer.
  3. Make every decline and refer explicit, with a named reason.
  4. Return an explanation with each quote.
  5. Test every change before it goes live, so nobody gets a price you didn't mean to give. Our post on testing insurance pricing models covers how.

For the bigger picture on channels, see AI for insurance distribution.

How Swallow fits

Every Swallow project can be priced through the API as soon as a version is published, and your own team can quote it from Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor through the Swallow MCP server. The same model also powers embedded forms and our voice and chat agents, which you can read about on the sales channels page. Talk to our team if you'd like to get a product ready for AI-led distribution.

Continue reading

From filing to rater: building pricing models from US rate filings

What sits inside a US rate filing, how to rebuild it as a working, tested rating model, where AI speeds things up and which gaps to expect.

Swallow compared: enterprise pricing platforms, core system raters and AI newcomers

Where Swallow sits against established insurance pricing and rating platforms and newer AI-led options, on model format, testing, approvals, AI and distribution.

Building pricing models with Claude and ChatGPT: what works, what doesn't

A practical look at building insurance pricing models with Claude and ChatGPT over MCP: where AI clients help, where they trip up and how to keep people in charge.

AI in insurance pricing: closing the gap between rating guide and live model

Pricing design is rarely the bottleneck. Implementation is. How AI shortens the path from signed-off rating guide to a tested, live pricing model.

Fair value under Consumer Duty: the evidence your pricing should leave behind

What the FCA's Consumer Duty and pricing rules ask of insurance pricing teams, and the records that make fair value something you can show, not just claim.

How to connect the Swallow MCP server to Claude

Connect Claude to your Swallow pricing infrastructure using MCP to analyse models, inspect rating logic and interact with your tools using natural language

Regression testing insurance pricing: why every rate change needs a test suite

How to build a regression test suite for an insurance pricing model, from worked examples and band edges to declines, refers and real quotes.

A safer rate change: eight steps from analysis to monitoring

A repeatable process for insurance rate changes, from the change statement and draft version to tests, approval, release and monitoring, and where AI helps.

Readable by design: pricing models people can check, even when AI writes them

When AI drafts pricing logic, review becomes the slow step. Why a declarative, readable model format is faster to check and audit than generated code.

Moving off a spreadsheet rater without changing a single price

How to tell when an Excel rater has outgrown its job, what keeping it really costs, and a migration plan that uses the spreadsheet's own answers as the tests.

Starting an MGA: from rating guide to first live quote

A practical route for a new MGA's first product: agreeing terms with capacity, building and testing the model, picking channels and watching rates after launch.

AI and insurance distribution: one price, every channel

Aggregators, embedded journeys, chat, voice and AI agents all need the same thing from pricing. Why one explainable rating engine should sit behind them all.

AI in regulated industries: why explainability has to come first

Insurers can get real gains from AI and still meet what the FCA, the EU and US regulators expect, provided every decision can be explained, reproduced and signed off.

Swallow vs Earnix

Swallow and Earnix Price-It compared for insurance pricing and rating: who each is for, how models are built, tested and released, how AI is used, and distribution.

Swallow vs Guidewire PricingCenter

Swallow and Guidewire PricingCenter compared: who each suits, how each relates to PolicyCenter, how models are built, tested and released, AI and distribution.

Swallow vs Duck Creek Rating

Swallow and Duck Creek Rating compared: who each suits, suite and standalone use, how rates are built, tested and released, deployment, AI and distribution.

Swallow vs Oracle Insbridge

Swallow and Oracle Insurance Insbridge Enterprise Rating compared: architecture, how rates are built and changed, testing, integration, AI, and how to migrate.

Swallow vs Akur8 Deploy

Swallow and Akur8 Deploy compared: where each rating engine fits, how rates reach production, testing and sign-off, how AI is used and when to pick which.

Swallow vs hyperexponential (hx Renew)

Swallow and hyperexponential's hx Renew compared: who each suits, Python models versus readable JSON, testing and approvals, AI and the Guidewire deal.

Swallow vs WTW Radar

Swallow and WTW Radar compared for pricing and real-time rating: who each suits, how models are built and changed, testing and approvals, and AI features.

Swallow vs building a rating engine in house

Build or buy? A fair look at writing your own insurance rating engine versus using Swallow: testing, versioning, audit, serving at volume and rate changes.

How to connect the Swallow MCP server to ChatGPT

Connect ChatGPT to your Swallow pricing infrastructure using MCP to analyse models, inspect rating logic and interact with your tools using natural language

Swallow Data: Live insight into your pricing performance

See how Swallow’s Data area gives you real-time visibility over quotes, performance, and customer behaviour across your entire pricing model

Swallow Tests: Validate your pricing with real-world scenarios

See how Swallow’s Tests area lets you simulate quotes, inspect calculations, and perfect your pricing model before publishing

Swallow Build: Bring your pricing model to life

A quick look at how Swallow’s Build area lets you edit, test, and publish pricing models with complete control and instant feedback

Swallow Overview: Core features at a glance

See how the AI actuary inside Swallow turns a simple prompt into a fully tested and deployable insurance pricing model for electric vehicles in just a few clicks

Why Modern Insurers Are Moving to AI-Powered Enterprise Pricing Engines

A look at how AI is transforming insurance pricing, from spreadsheet-based models to enterprise-grade rating engines built for speed, consistency, and control

Swallow / MGT

How MGT use Swallow to power AI-driven pricing, accelerate model updates and support fast, reliable commercial insurance quoting.

AI Agent for Insurance Products

Sam talks through our new AI Agent for Insurance products. Get a new Insurance product built and live within a couple of minutes.

Swallow / Ouch!

How Ouch! used Swallow to launch digital takaful products faster, with transparent pricing, audit readiness and seamless model updates.

Pricing Pain Point #4 - Slow deployment

Whilst the modelling process is where pricing strategy begins, getting changes in front of customers is where the rubber hits the road and new pricing is tested with real customers. Moving quickly to make changes to live pricing offers pricing teams an opportunity to respond to the market, test and iterate, and roll out new products.

Pricing Pain Point #3 - Testing concerns

With pricing critical to growth and profitability, businesses must understand the impact of any price changes, as well as ensure what goes live to customers is identical to that modelled. With pricing driven by complex financial models, this is particularly true - a percentage point error in the code deployed could easily lead to a significant financial impact.

Swallow / Open

How Open used Swallow to launch embedded insurance in the UK faster, with flexible pricing, rapid updates and lower operational cost.

Pricing Pain Point #2 - Lengthy process

In any fast moving business, having a clear record of decisions, changes and their impacts is key to operating efficiently and successfully. For regulated industries, a clear governance process is a requirement and critical to ensuring compliance with local regulations.

Pricing Pain Point #1 - Data issues

Underlying all pricing strategy is data, whether it be on the market and competition or a company’s own quote, sales and cost data. Collecting this data and using it to inform future pricing decisions is one of a pricing team’s key objectives.

Swallow / Rivr

How Rivr uses Swallow to deliver pricing models faster, with better governance, smoother client handovers and one-click deployment.

What we've learned about pricing

Over the past few months, we've talked to over 100 pricing and technology professionals from a range of industries. From our conversations, many pricing pain points have emerged, helping us to better understand the challenges businesses face and inform the direction of our platform.

Why I created Swallow

Financial pricing models (think insurance, credit, mortgages, financing, leasing, memberships) have, and continue to be, designed in spreadsheets and published through in-house custom code or legacy enterprise software. Pricing changes can take weeks instead of hours.

We feel you, pricing is hard...

Dynamic pricing is hard to create and serve to your customers. Because it is hard, it can become a technical concern rather than a business concern. Here be where the dragons lie.