Swallow vs hyperexponential (hx Renew)

hyperexponential (hx) is built for specialty, commercial and reinsurance carriers whose actuaries want to write their own pricing models in Python and use them inside an underwriting workflow. Swallow is built for insurers and MGAs that need a rating engine for live quoting, with models underwriters can check without reading code and AI in the build. If your risks are complex, priced one by one by underwriters, and your team wants to code its own models, hx deserves a close look. If you need a product quoting live over an API, at volume, with quick and controlled rate changes, look at Swallow.

hyperexponential in brief

hyperexponential is a software company based in London. hx has described its pricing platform, hx Renew, as a "Pricing Decision Intelligence" platform. Actuaries build models in Python on the platform, often by refactoring Excel raters, and underwriters use them to price individual risks. In a 2023 case study, Aviva's Global Corporate and Specialty team built 20 pricing models in nine months, replacing 20 separate Excel rating tools.

hx now describes itself more broadly as "the agentic platform for commercial P&C insurance underwriting". Its site covers submission triage, risk assessment, renewals and portfolio monitoring across reinsurance, US admitted, specialty and commercial lines, and MGAs. hx says its platform supports underwriting decisions on more than 75bn of commercial premium a year, and names Aviva, Allianz, Beazley, Markel, HDI and Convex among its customers.

On AI, hx lists AI-assisted model development, an Actuarial Agent, and hyperoperator, an agent that coordinates specialist agents for submission and monitoring work. hx says its agents act only within set authorities, permissions and review points, with an audit trail of what they do. It partners with Akur8, Duck Creek and Guidewire.

On 27 October 2026 Guidewire signed a definitive agreement to buy hyperexponential for 1.7bn in cash, plus up to 400m in contingent payments. Guidewire expects the deal to close by the end of January 2027 and hasn't said how hx products will be sold after that.

hx doesn't publish its prices.

Swallow in brief

Swallow is an AI-powered pricing platform and rating engine for insurers and MGAs. A model is a plain JSON file of steps that run in order: inputs, rate table lookups, calculations, transforms, exclusions, refers, excesses and endorsements. Each version carries its own tests and moves from draft to approved to published, with every step logged. One engine prices quotes over a real-time API, through embedded forms and in voice and chat, and is built to scale to millions of quotes a day. Models cover lines from pet and fleet to property, cyber and US filed programmes.

At a glance

Swallow hyperexponential (hx Renew)
What it is AI-powered pricing platform and rating engine Pricing and underwriting platform for commercial P&C
Typical buyer Insurers and MGAs of any size Typically specialty, commercial and reinsurance carriers and MGAs
Main job Live quoting at volume, across lines Underwriters pricing complex, individual risks
Where models come from Rating guides, Excel raters, US rate filings or any modelling tool Written by your actuaries in Python, often from Excel raters
Model format Readable JSON of ordered steps, built in code or on a no-code canvas Python code
Testing Tests on every version, expected against actual Parallel-run validation and version control described; detail not published
Approvals and audit Draft, approved, published; approvals by role; every quote records its version Audit trail of decisions and model changes
AI AI first drafts and tests; MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT and Cursor AI-assisted model building; underwriting agents within set authorities
Channels Real-time REST API, embedded forms, voice and chat Web app, API and policy admin connections; Guidewire and Duck Creek partnerships
Commercial model Talk to us Not published

Where they differ

What kind of risk is being priced

hx grew up in specialty and London Market business, where an underwriter prices one complex risk at a time and a model often needs logic written for that risk alone. That's where the freedom of Python counts most, and where hx is strongest. Swallow is made for rules-based rating that runs on every quote: personal lines, SME, commercial packages and specialty products sold through an API, a broker portal or an aggregator.

Python versus steps you can read

Python can express almost anything, which suits actuaries who code. It also means every change is reviewed as code, and underwriters or auditors usually need someone technical to walk them through it. A Swallow model is configuration that anyone can follow step by step: inputs with plain labels, rate tables as rows, formulas written out. Each test is a full set of inputs with its expected result, and a debug trace shows every input, lookup and formula behind any quote. Endorsement steps choose the forms and clauses for the policy documents, so wording and price come from the same rules.

Who builds and maintains the models

On hx, your actuaries usually write and maintain the Python. On Swallow your team can build models on the drag-and-drop canvas, edit the JSON, or work with an AI client. If you'd rather hand it over, send us your rating guide, spreadsheet or filing and we'll talk you through getting it live.

What AI is pointed at

hx is heading towards agents that work across the underwriting process: reading submissions, chasing missing data and watching the book. Swallow uses AI on the production model itself: a first draft from a description and spreadsheet, tests generated from a prompt, and governance reports and version summaries for reviewers. Over the MCP server, Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor can learn the format, draft a model, validate it and run its tests. They can't create, edit or publish a project. A person uploads the model to a draft, approves it and publishes it.

Cost and ownership

hx doesn't publish pricing, and the Guidewire deal raises a question worth putting to any vendor: what happens to the contract, roadmap and integrations under a new owner. For Swallow pricing, including the self-hosted enterprise offering, talk to us.

Pick hyperexponential if

  • You write specialty, London Market or reinsurance business that underwriters price risk by risk.
  • Your actuaries code in Python and want complete freedom in how models are written.
  • You want pricing inside a wider underwriting workflow, with submission triage and portfolio monitoring.
  • You run Guidewire and want a pricing platform that's joining the same group.

Pick Swallow if

  • You need high-volume, real-time quoting through an API, embedded forms or an aggregator.
  • You want models that underwriters, compliance and auditors can read without reading code.
  • Your rates come from a rating guide, spreadsheet or filing, and you want tests on every version.
  • You want general AI clients helping to build models, with people approving and publishing every release.

Next steps

Walk through a complete Swallow model on the developer page, see how quotes are priced through the API, or get in touch. For the wider market, read our comparison of Swallow and other insurance pricing platforms, or see how Swallow compares with Guidewire PricingCenter.

Based on publicly available information as of November 2026. Vendor offerings change and vary by customer, so confirm current details with each vendor.

Continue reading

From filing to rater: building pricing models from US rate filings

What sits inside a US rate filing, how to rebuild it as a working, tested rating model, where AI speeds things up and which gaps to expect.

Swallow compared: enterprise pricing platforms, core system raters and AI newcomers

Where Swallow sits against established insurance pricing and rating platforms and newer AI-led options, on model format, testing, approvals, AI and distribution.

Building pricing models with Claude and ChatGPT: what works, what doesn't

A practical look at building insurance pricing models with Claude and ChatGPT over MCP: where AI clients help, where they trip up and how to keep people in charge.

AI in insurance pricing: closing the gap between rating guide and live model

Pricing design is rarely the bottleneck. Implementation is. How AI shortens the path from signed-off rating guide to a tested, live pricing model.

Fair value under Consumer Duty: the evidence your pricing should leave behind

What the FCA's Consumer Duty and pricing rules ask of insurance pricing teams, and the records that make fair value something you can show, not just claim.

When the customer is an AI agent: getting your pricing ready

AI assistants are starting to shop for insurance on people's behalf. Here's what your rating engine has to give them to quote your products properly.

How to connect the Swallow MCP server to Claude

Connect Claude to your Swallow pricing infrastructure using MCP to analyse models, inspect rating logic and interact with your tools using natural language

Regression testing insurance pricing: why every rate change needs a test suite

How to build a regression test suite for an insurance pricing model, from worked examples and band edges to declines, refers and real quotes.

A safer rate change: eight steps from analysis to monitoring

A repeatable process for insurance rate changes, from the change statement and draft version to tests, approval, release and monitoring, and where AI helps.

Readable by design: pricing models people can check, even when AI writes them

When AI drafts pricing logic, review becomes the slow step. Why a declarative, readable model format is faster to check and audit than generated code.

Moving off a spreadsheet rater without changing a single price

How to tell when an Excel rater has outgrown its job, what keeping it really costs, and a migration plan that uses the spreadsheet's own answers as the tests.

Starting an MGA: from rating guide to first live quote

A practical route for a new MGA's first product: agreeing terms with capacity, building and testing the model, picking channels and watching rates after launch.

AI and insurance distribution: one price, every channel

Aggregators, embedded journeys, chat, voice and AI agents all need the same thing from pricing. Why one explainable rating engine should sit behind them all.

AI in regulated industries: why explainability has to come first

Insurers can get real gains from AI and still meet what the FCA, the EU and US regulators expect, provided every decision can be explained, reproduced and signed off.

Swallow vs Earnix

Swallow and Earnix Price-It compared for insurance pricing and rating: who each is for, how models are built, tested and released, how AI is used, and distribution.

Swallow vs Guidewire PricingCenter

Swallow and Guidewire PricingCenter compared: who each suits, how each relates to PolicyCenter, how models are built, tested and released, AI and distribution.

Swallow vs Duck Creek Rating

Swallow and Duck Creek Rating compared: who each suits, suite and standalone use, how rates are built, tested and released, deployment, AI and distribution.

Swallow vs Oracle Insbridge

Swallow and Oracle Insurance Insbridge Enterprise Rating compared: architecture, how rates are built and changed, testing, integration, AI, and how to migrate.

Swallow vs Akur8 Deploy

Swallow and Akur8 Deploy compared: where each rating engine fits, how rates reach production, testing and sign-off, how AI is used and when to pick which.

Swallow vs WTW Radar

Swallow and WTW Radar compared for pricing and real-time rating: who each suits, how models are built and changed, testing and approvals, and AI features.

Swallow vs building a rating engine in house

Build or buy? A fair look at writing your own insurance rating engine versus using Swallow: testing, versioning, audit, serving at volume and rate changes.

How to connect the Swallow MCP server to ChatGPT

Connect ChatGPT to your Swallow pricing infrastructure using MCP to analyse models, inspect rating logic and interact with your tools using natural language

Swallow Data: Live insight into your pricing performance

See how Swallow’s Data area gives you real-time visibility over quotes, performance, and customer behaviour across your entire pricing model

Swallow Tests: Validate your pricing with real-world scenarios

See how Swallow’s Tests area lets you simulate quotes, inspect calculations, and perfect your pricing model before publishing

Swallow Build: Bring your pricing model to life

A quick look at how Swallow’s Build area lets you edit, test, and publish pricing models with complete control and instant feedback

Swallow Overview: Core features at a glance

See how the AI actuary inside Swallow turns a simple prompt into a fully tested and deployable insurance pricing model for electric vehicles in just a few clicks

Why Modern Insurers Are Moving to AI-Powered Enterprise Pricing Engines

A look at how AI is transforming insurance pricing, from spreadsheet-based models to enterprise-grade rating engines built for speed, consistency, and control

Swallow / MGT

How MGT use Swallow to power AI-driven pricing, accelerate model updates and support fast, reliable commercial insurance quoting.

AI Agent for Insurance Products

Sam talks through our new AI Agent for Insurance products. Get a new Insurance product built and live within a couple of minutes.

Swallow / Ouch!

How Ouch! used Swallow to launch digital takaful products faster, with transparent pricing, audit readiness and seamless model updates.

Pricing Pain Point #4 - Slow deployment

Whilst the modelling process is where pricing strategy begins, getting changes in front of customers is where the rubber hits the road and new pricing is tested with real customers. Moving quickly to make changes to live pricing offers pricing teams an opportunity to respond to the market, test and iterate, and roll out new products.

Pricing Pain Point #3 - Testing concerns

With pricing critical to growth and profitability, businesses must understand the impact of any price changes, as well as ensure what goes live to customers is identical to that modelled. With pricing driven by complex financial models, this is particularly true - a percentage point error in the code deployed could easily lead to a significant financial impact.

Swallow / Open

How Open used Swallow to launch embedded insurance in the UK faster, with flexible pricing, rapid updates and lower operational cost.

Pricing Pain Point #2 - Lengthy process

In any fast moving business, having a clear record of decisions, changes and their impacts is key to operating efficiently and successfully. For regulated industries, a clear governance process is a requirement and critical to ensuring compliance with local regulations.

Pricing Pain Point #1 - Data issues

Underlying all pricing strategy is data, whether it be on the market and competition or a company’s own quote, sales and cost data. Collecting this data and using it to inform future pricing decisions is one of a pricing team’s key objectives.

Swallow / Rivr

How Rivr uses Swallow to deliver pricing models faster, with better governance, smoother client handovers and one-click deployment.

What we've learned about pricing

Over the past few months, we've talked to over 100 pricing and technology professionals from a range of industries. From our conversations, many pricing pain points have emerged, helping us to better understand the challenges businesses face and inform the direction of our platform.

Why I created Swallow

Financial pricing models (think insurance, credit, mortgages, financing, leasing, memberships) have, and continue to be, designed in spreadsheets and published through in-house custom code or legacy enterprise software. Pricing changes can take weeks instead of hours.

We feel you, pricing is hard...

Dynamic pricing is hard to create and serve to your customers. Because it is hard, it can become a technical concern rather than a business concern. Here be where the dragons lie.